Nearshoring tenants now qualify a park on how much power it can actually deliver, and many parks were provisioned for a fraction of what modern manufacturing and logistics loads require. MEP assesses real available capacity, interconnection position, and rooftop solar potential, with no tie to any equipment vendor.
Start with one asset or a full portfolio. Written reply within 1 business day. NDA available before data is shared.Multi-site and portfolio energy work across manufacturing and commercial assets
Capacity, interconnection, and roof are now leasing variables. MEP measures them before recommending any action.
Provisioning that suited light manufacturing and warehousing does not carry automotive, electronics, cold storage, or data-adjacent loads. The gap is electrical, not commercial.
Prospective tenants ask about available capacity, substation headroom, and interconnection timeline. A developer who cannot answer with evidence loses the tenant to a park that can.
Common areas are metered loosely, tenant submetering is inconsistent, and large roof areas sit unused. The firms offering to assess this usually sell transformers, switchgear, or solar.
MEP reads the asset the way a demanding tenant would. Where a measure improves the asset, MEP writes a vendor-ready scope so the developer can run comparable bids. MEP does not sell or install the equipment.
Assess real available capacity at the substation and feeders, and the headroom for additional load under the current interconnection position.
Test that capacity against the load profiles of the tenants the park is targeting, so leasing can answer a specific tenant question rather than a general one.
Review common-area energy cost and the submetering that determines whether tenants can be billed accurately and asset performance can be proven to investors.
Model rooftop potential across the park's roof area against structure, orientation, and the applicable tariff, with modeled yield and return.
The documentation answers each function in the terms it uses, from the investor pack through to contractor qualification.
How does this affect occupancy, net operating income, and asset value?
Traceable assumptions and figures that hold up in an investor pack
Can we answer a tenant's power questions with evidence?
Documented capacity, interconnection, and tenant load fit
Where is common-area cost escaping, and is submetering billing tenants fairly?
Measures scoped around live tenancy and a corrected meter map
Is the common-area electrical system safe and ready for tenant fit-outs?
Scopes specified to NOM-001-SEDE, plus portfolio Scope 2 data
MEP needs park or building information, available single-line diagrams, roof area and structural information, and the tenant profile you are targeting. Common-area utility data and tenant metering are requested after the first conversation.
Request the readiness reviewCapacity, tenant fit, common-area cost, and rooftop solar are reviewed against the same measured assumptions, and every figure in a deliverable traces to that asset's own data. Because each park's capacity, interconnection position, and tenant mix differ, MEP presents findings per asset rather than as a number that travels between them.
MEP advises and specifies rather than certifies, so the review supports inspection readiness and safe tenant fit-outs without standing in for a certification body. Individual results vary by asset, and MEP does not guarantee specific outcomes.
Share the tenant profile you are targeting and the electrical information you have. An MEP advisor will provide a written reply within 1 business day and a scoped proposal. Where you proceed, MEP writes vendor-ready scopes and governs the bid as owner's representative, with no stake in which vendor wins.
Request the readiness reviewOrganizations remain confidential. Verification contacts are available during qualified evaluation.
The energy audit recommendations were practical and supported by solid financial and operational rationale, making them easy to evaluate and act upon.
The energy study was very well done and delivered real results. The team took the time to understand how our plant actually operates and provided clear, practical recommendations.
The support we received on our Power Purchase Agreement was excellent. The team conducted a detailed and professional review.
Feedback from completed engagements. Client identities remain confidential. Individual results depend on facility profile, tariff, contract terms, and execution.
MEP will show you where cost and risk sit at this portfolio before you commit to anything. Four fields to start.
