The energy audit recommendations were practical and supported by solid financial and operational rationale, making them easy to evaluate and act upon.
Technical, legal, and efficiency engineering from one team
MEP combines utility data, field findings, and financial analysis in a record that management can approve and execute. Each stage answers a defined question before more time or capital is committed.
Resolve the question before expanding the scope
The work can stop, narrow, or change direction at every gate.
- FrameIs there a material decision worth investigating?
Start with the operating and financial question
Define the site context, decision owner, consequence, and timing.
- BaselineWhat must be measured or excluded?
Use available data to define the issue
Review bills, load data, schedules, and facility information.
- ValidateDoes the evidence support the case?
Measure in the context of production
Test assumptions during representative operating periods.
- BuildApprove, defer, redesign, or stop?
Put engineering, economics, and risk together
Compare capital, savings logic, dependencies, and sensitivities.
- ExecuteDid delivery match the approved case?
Protect the approved case
Support bids, technical review, commissioning, and M&V.
From a completed Level 2 audit
What a Level 2 audit looks like
Pages from a completed audit of a Mexican manufacturing plant. Client name, address, and account data have been removed. Everything else is presented as delivered.
Figures shown are for one facility with its own baseline and tariff. Identified savings have not been verified under M&V. MEP does not guarantee savings.
Review the depth of the deliverable, then speak with MEP about the facility, the decision, and the appropriate next step.
- Vendor-neutralCompensated only by the client
- CEMCertified Energy Manager
- CMVPCertified Measurement and Verification Professional
- ISO 50001Lead Auditor
- ASHRAEMember, ASHRAE 211 methodology
- IPMVPVerified engagements
- Since 2015Mexico City and New York
Feedback from operating and procurement teams
Organizations remain confidential. Verification contacts are available during qualified evaluation.
The energy study was very well done and delivered real results. The team took the time to understand how our plant actually operates and provided clear, practical recommendations.
The support we received on our Power Purchase Agreement was excellent. The team conducted a detailed and professional review.
Feedback from completed engagements. Client identities remain confidential. Individual results depend on facility profile, tariff, contract terms, and execution.
Request an assessment. Get a preliminary analysis in 1 business day.
MEP will show you where cost and risk sit at this facility before you commit to anything. Four fields to start.
- Reply from a senior advisor, not a sales team
- NDA available before any document is shared
- MEP sells no equipment and takes no supplier commissions