Purchase price is only part of water cost
Pumping, treatment, heating, cooling, chemicals, labor, lost product, wastewater, and discharge obligations can exceed the inlet charge.
Evidence to connectFull cost by cubic meter and process
Reduce water cost and production risk
MEP connects source, treatment, process use, cooling, boilers, sanitation, reuse, discharge, energy, and production so multisite manufacturers can rank water risk and capital needs.
Start with one site or a complete facility list. NDA available before data is shared.Conditions that affect the portfolio decision
MEP first reviews the facts that could change scope, value, timing, or operating risk.
A plant balance must follow production
Monthly totals do not explain batch cycles, sanitation demand, cooling and boiler loads, product mix, leaks, or seasonal conditions.
Evidence to connectm³ per unit, operating state, source and discharge balance
Portfolio risk is local
Source reliability, aquifer and municipal conditions, permits, quality, reuse options, and production criticality vary by site.
Evidence to connectSource, permit, quality, days of autonomy, critical process
Compare sites on a consistent basis
The comparison method stays consistent, while the technical scope reflects the conditions at each facility.
Portfolio water risk screen
Compare source, consumption, production intensity, discharge, cost, resilience, and data maturity across sites.
First lookSite list, sources, bills, permits, output and incidents
Plant water balance
Trace water from source through treatment, process, cooling, boilers, sanitation, product, reuse, and discharge.
First lookMeters, process map, flows, quality and operating schedules
Loss and reuse analysis
Identify physical loss, unnecessary treatment, recirculation, heat and water recovery, and reuse constraints.
First lookFlow, pressure, temperature, chemistry, cleaning requirements
Capital and resilience plan
Sequence metering, controls, process changes, treatment, storage, reuse, and supply measures by risk and value.
First lookCritical loads, capital plan, permit and quality constraints
What each decision owner must approve
The analysis addresses the technical, operating, financial, and commercial questions assigned to each function.
Decision ownerQuestion to answerMEP output
Plant operations
Which water conditions can stop or constrain production?
Critical use hierarchy, autonomy, and response plan
EHS and compliance
Are source, quality, discharge, and reporting obligations controlled?
Permit and evidence register with monitoring responsibilities
Engineering
Where should metering, process, treatment, or reuse work begin?
Water balance, option screen, design criteria, and dependencies
Finance
What is the full cost and risk-adjusted priority across sites?
Model of full cost and avoided loss, capex, and portfolio ranking
Multisite water risk and intensity screen
MEP confirms scope after reviewing the portfolio, the current decision, and the available operating data.
Request the starting reviewManagement outputs
- Portfolio source, intensity, and risk register
- Water balance and meter plan for priority sites
- Loss, reuse, and resilience opportunity screen
- Capital sequence with compliance dependencies
Share the site list, current decision, and available data.
An MEP advisor will provide an initial review within 1 business day and identify the site or workstream that should be examined first.
Request a portfolio review- Vendor-neutralCompensated only by the client
- CEMCertified Energy Manager
- CMVPCertified Measurement and Verification Professional
- ISO 50001Lead Auditor
- ASHRAEMember, ASHRAE 211 methodology
- IPMVPVerified engagements
- Since 2015Mexico City and New York
Feedback from operating and procurement teams
Organizations remain confidential. Verification contacts are available during qualified evaluation.
The energy audit recommendations were practical and supported by solid financial and operational rationale, making them easy to evaluate and act upon.
Lori C.
Procurement Manager, Global Auto Parts Supplier
The energy study was very well done and delivered real results. The team took the time to understand how our plant actually operates and provided clear, practical recommendations.
Ismael H.
Plant Manager, Global Mining Company
The support we received on our Power Purchase Agreement was excellent. The team conducted a detailed and professional review.
Héctor V.
Plant Manager, Global Battery Manufacturer
Feedback from completed engagements. Client identities remain confidential. Individual results depend on facility profile, tariff, contract terms, and execution.
Request an assessment. Get a preliminary analysis in 1 business day.
MEP will show you where cost and risk sit at this facility before you commit to anything. Four fields to start.
- Reply from a senior advisor, not a sales team
- NDA available before any document is shared
- MEP sells no equipment and takes no supplier commissions