Industrial electrical infrastructure supporting a manufacturing facility in Mexico.
Energy audits and efficiency
Facility assessments that prioritize measurable savings across compressed air, HVAC, process cooling, motors, and other major loads.
Lower energy costs. Protect plant operations.
Independent procurement, efficiency and onsite energy advisory for manufacturers, hotel groups, real estate portfolios and infrastructure operators across Mexico.
Client-side advice, documented assumptions and execution support from initial analysis through implementation.
Begin with one recent electricity bill. NDA available.
Selected clients
Core services for industrial energy users
Explore energy efficiency
Energy procurement and PPAs
Independent tariff, Qualified Supply, PPA, and supplier analysis designed to improve economics and reduce contract risk.
Onsite generation opportunities assessed at an industrial facility.
Onsite solar and BESS
Technical and commercial evaluation of onsite solar and storage, including developer selection, financing structures, and contract review.
Virtual Energy Manager
Continuous monitoring, anomaly detection, and expert guidance without adding a full-time internal energy position.
What each stakeholder gets
COOs and plant managers
Prioritized actions aligned with uptime, maintenance windows, equipment condition, and implementation capacity.
CFOs and procurement leaders
Conservative savings models, capital requirements, payback analysis, supplier comparisons, and contract-risk visibility.
HSE and sustainability leaders
Energy and emissions measures aligned with safety requirements, GHG accounting, and corporate reporting.
How we work
A disciplined path from initial review to implementation
-
Initial energy review
We begin with a 30-minute discussion and one recent electricity bill to understand cost, reliability, and operational priorities.
-
Technical and commercial analysis
Our team evaluates the facility, tariff, load profile, contract exposure, and implementation constraints. Additional data is requested only when needed.
-
Decision-ready roadmap
You receive prioritized actions with savings estimates, capital requirements, payback periods, risks, and recommended next steps.
Procurement outcomes and team experience
1,150+
MW migrated to renewable energy
Total client capacity supported through our procurement advisory services
25.4%
Weighted average savings
Client MEM transitions from 2020 through 2025
2015
Operating in Mexico
Independent industrial energy advisory
21 years
Average energy-sector experience
Across our advisory and technical team
Measurement basis
- 1,150+ MW represents client load migrated through MEP procurement advisory.
- 25.4% is the weighted average savings for MEM transitions from 2020 through 2025.
- 21 years is the average energy-sector experience across the current team.
- Savings depend on facility profile, contract terms, market conditions and implementation.
Selected case studies
Three engagement summaries with the baseline, intervention, measurement period and modeled-versus-realized status separated for review.
Tier-1 automotive stamping facility
El Bajío, Mexico · CFE GDMTH
Documented performance case
Documented outcome
US$487K documented annual utility savings
22% utility-cost reduction · 127 kW peak-demand reduction · 1,140 tCO2e/year
Review evidence basis
- Baseline
- 24/6 production; peak-demand penalties represented 34% of monthly utility spend; compressed-air specific power was 22.8 kW per 100 CFM.
- Recommendation / intervention
- VFD compressor retrofit, chilled-water optimization and a 499 kWp onsite solar system, sequenced efficiency-first.
- Date / analysis period
- Case study issued June 2026. The source reports completed implementation but does not state the performance measurement period.
- Modeled vs. realized
- The source reports 1,847 MWh/year of efficiency savings, 787,600 kWh/year of solar generation and US$487K in annual savings; it does not include a modeled-versus-actual table.
- Evidence method
- ASHRAE Level 2 assessment, site measurements and documented utility-cost reduction. Baseline dates and the verification protocol are not stated in the source.
Tier-1 data center BESS and chiller program
Querétaro, Mexico · CFE GDMTH
Verified performance case
Documented outcome
US$418K annual energy-cost reduction
22.4% bill reduction · 3,200 to 2,780 kW peak demand · PUE 1.62 to 1.44
Review evidence basis
- Baseline
- US$155,300 monthly energy cost; 3,200 kW peak demand; PUE 1.62; Capacidad and Distribución charges represented 67% of the bill.
- Recommendation / intervention
- VFDs and reset logic on eight chilled-water pumps plus a 1.2 MW / 2.4 MWh BESS for peak shaving and time-of-use arbitrage.
- Date / analysis period
- Nine-month implementation roadmap. Case study issued June 2026; full baseline and verification dates are not stated.
- Modeled vs. realized
- Projected: US$123,200/month, 2,850 kW peak, PUE 1.48 and 1.58 GWh/year saved. Actual: US$120,500/month, 2,780 kW, PUE 1.44 and 1.645 GWh/year.
- Evidence method
- ASHRAE 211 Level 2 load profiling, BMS integration and reported M&V of chiller savings, followed by an actual-versus-projected KPI comparison.
Luxury resort solar program
Los Cabos, Baja California Sur · CFE GDMTH
Verified 12-month solar case
Documented outcome
US$214,200 realized Year 1 electricity-cost reduction
2,531 MWh actual yield · US$252K RFP savings · 18% modeled 20-year IRR
Review evidence basis
- Baseline
- 8.4 GWh/year consumption, US$1.1M annual energy spend, 1.6 MW peak demand and a US$1.512M single-developer proposal.
- Recommendation / intervention
- 1.4 MW rooftop/carport solar, a five-bid vendor-neutral RFP, owner's-representative oversight, EMS integration and measurement and verification.
- Date / analysis period
- Twelve months after commissioning; the case study was issued in 2026.
- Modeled vs. realized
- 2,550 MWh modeled versus 2,531 MWh actual (-0.75%); US$218K modeled cost reduction versus US$214.2K actual (-1.7%).
- Evidence method
- IPMVP-aligned plan, EMS monitoring and quarterly actual-versus-model reports; 0.5% annual degradation and 2.0% soiling loss were modeled.
Our independence
Mexico Energy Partners provides advisory services. We do not sell electricity or equipment. Our role is to evaluate options, structure decisions, and support implementation in the client's financial and operational interests.
- Commercial role
- We advise clients on procurement, efficiency, onsite generation, storage, and related energy decisions. We are not the electricity supplier or equipment seller.
- Compensation
- Our advisory fee and any compensation connected to a supplier, developer, referral, or subcontractor relationship are disclosed in the written engagement scope or before the related recommendation.
- Supplier and developer conflicts
- Potential conflicts are disclosed before a recommendation or counterparty selection. Options are evaluated against documented technical, commercial, operational, and risk criteria.
The client retains final selection and approval authority. The basis for material recommendations is documented so decision makers can review the assumptions, tradeoffs, and any disclosed commercial relationships.
Inside our client deliverables
Redacted excerpts show how we move from facility data to quantified measures, implementation priorities, and executive decisions.
Audit report architecture
The reports connect plant conditions, historical energy use, baselines, and system-level findings in one decision narrative.
Industrial energy audit structure
01Facility and process characterization
02Historical consumption and demand analysis
03Energy baseline and performance indicators
04System-level energy conservation measures
05Economic and environmental evaluation
06Savings summary and conclusions
Derived from redacted English and Spanish MEP industrial audit reports.
Savings decision table
Each measure is presented with the financial and technical fields needed for capital review and prioritization.
Savings summary
| Decision field | Reported output |
|---|---|
| Energy effect | kWh and peak demand |
| Financial impact | MXN/year and savings % |
| Capital requirement | Estimated investment |
| Return profile | Simple payback in years |
| Environmental impact | Avoided kg CO2e |
Representative structure from redacted savings-summary pages. Client values remain confidential.
Measure-level engineering analysis
Recommendations document the operating issue, technical concept, economics, dependencies, and environmental impact.
Measure analysis
- Opportunity identified
- Observed operating condition, load, and source of inefficiency
- Technical concept
- Recommended equipment, controls, sizing, and operating logic
- Economic case
- Energy savings, cost savings, investment, and simple payback
- Implementation factors
- Operational constraints, dependencies, and measurement method
- Environmental impact
- Modeled CO2 reduction where applicable
Representative framework used across the supplied redacted audit and diagnostic reports.
Full redacted examples are available after a brief qualification call and, when appropriate, an NDA.
Request a redacted sample reportRequest an initial energy review
Start with a short discussion and one recent electricity bill. We will assess the main cost, contract, reliability, and implementation questions before recommending a scope.
Independent advice. NDA available when appropriate.
Information submitted through this form is used to evaluate your request. See our privacy policy.